User avatar

Incandescence

  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Guns

    You don't have a tyrannical government because other countries, namely America, is keeping check on the world powers and our allies. America would not let Britain be overrun by dictatorship, ...

    Jun 17, 2005
  • Dramatic Poetry Re: sixteen

    You seemed quite detached from this yourself. It was like a second-person nostalgia. It was pretty, but it didn't leave any impact on me, nothing to contemplate later about my ...

    Jun 17, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Guns

    Okay, fine. I'll concede the allegory, solely because it isn't worth it, particularly, to argue that. SO, that aside... By eliminating guns from the social arena, you only leave room ...

    Jun 17, 2005
  • Lounge, The Re: Colours

    a capillary hint of red...

    Jun 16, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Guns

    It's a matter of personal safety and a right granted to Americans in the Constitution. Nobody is advocating the use of crossbows - what I was trying to point out ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Dramatic Poetry Re: Hello, God.

    I'm not a fan of religious poetry. Plain and simple. So I am biased, keep that in mind. I think that you have a good concept here, but you didn't ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Lounge, The Re: Michael Jacoson won????

    That's a tyrannical imposition on celebrities. If we don't like what celebrities are doing - we change celebrities. We don't require people to change for us.

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Dramatic Poetry Re: emotionless

    I don't generally enjoy explaining the meaning of my poetry, but for clarification: I did not give my ex "proper closure" and being the dumb broad she is thought we ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • General Fiction Short Stories Re: BLAHAHAHABAH! Hourglass, enjoy...

    This is hardly breathtaking. I don't know what the other reviewers were on when they wrote their comments, but I'm sure you're going to wish I had had it when ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Dramatic Poetry Re: It's Alright

    Your metronomical device was very good. The rhythm was perfect. The subject matter, however, is a different story. Try to be a little more original, as this reminded me of ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Lounge, The Re: Michael Jacoson won????

    That is exactly what I am saying. There was not enough evidence for the case against Jackson. It was a case built entirely around inference and innuendo - NOT the ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Guns

    I could use a crossbow and do just as much damage with a gun. Guns were invented, intially, for the purpose of hunting. When people began using them in wars, ...

    Jun 15, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Guns

    Can you please show me where it says that guns were intended explicitly for the harm of others? No, you can't. They were invented, intially, to make hunting easier so ...

    Jun 14, 2005
  • Lounge, The Re: Michael Jacoson won????

    He didn't "endanger" anyone. Parents brought their children to him voluntarily. The point of the case is that there was always reasonable doubt: there was no concrete evidence. When we ...

    Jun 14, 2005
  • Lounge, The Re: Michael Jacoson won????

    What you think doesn't matter, per se. What does matter is the evidence, which is what the American Justice System was founded on: evidence. Inference and innuendo are entirely irrelevant ...

    Jun 14, 2005


Don't let fear keep you from some amazing opportunities.
— WeepingWisteria