-
Re: Guns
You don't have a tyrannical government because other countries, namely America, is keeping check on the world powers and our allies. America would not let Britain be overrun by dictatorship, ...
Jun 17, 2005 -
Re: sixteen
You seemed quite detached from this yourself. It was like a second-person nostalgia. It was pretty, but it didn't leave any impact on me, nothing to contemplate later about my ...
Jun 17, 2005 -
Re: Guns
Okay, fine. I'll concede the allegory, solely because it isn't worth it, particularly, to argue that. SO, that aside... By eliminating guns from the social arena, you only leave room ...
Jun 17, 2005 -
Re: Colours
a capillary hint of red...
Jun 16, 2005 -
Re: Guns
It's a matter of personal safety and a right granted to Americans in the Constitution. Nobody is advocating the use of crossbows - what I was trying to point out ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: Hello, God.
I'm not a fan of religious poetry. Plain and simple. So I am biased, keep that in mind. I think that you have a good concept here, but you didn't ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: Michael Jacoson won????
That's a tyrannical imposition on celebrities. If we don't like what celebrities are doing - we change celebrities. We don't require people to change for us.
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: emotionless
I don't generally enjoy explaining the meaning of my poetry, but for clarification: I did not give my ex "proper closure" and being the dumb broad she is thought we ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: BLAHAHAHABAH! Hourglass, enjoy...
This is hardly breathtaking. I don't know what the other reviewers were on when they wrote their comments, but I'm sure you're going to wish I had had it when ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: It's Alright
Your metronomical device was very good. The rhythm was perfect. The subject matter, however, is a different story. Try to be a little more original, as this reminded me of ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: Michael Jacoson won????
That is exactly what I am saying. There was not enough evidence for the case against Jackson. It was a case built entirely around inference and innuendo - NOT the ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: Guns
I could use a crossbow and do just as much damage with a gun. Guns were invented, intially, for the purpose of hunting. When people began using them in wars, ...
Jun 15, 2005 -
Re: Guns
Can you please show me where it says that guns were intended explicitly for the harm of others? No, you can't. They were invented, intially, to make hunting easier so ...
Jun 14, 2005 -
Re: Michael Jacoson won????
He didn't "endanger" anyone. Parents brought their children to him voluntarily. The point of the case is that there was always reasonable doubt: there was no concrete evidence. When we ...
Jun 14, 2005 -
Re: Michael Jacoson won????
What you think doesn't matter, per se. What does matter is the evidence, which is what the American Justice System was founded on: evidence. Inference and innuendo are entirely irrelevant ...
Jun 14, 2005
