Heidigirl666

Its not your choice to make about the childs future. Its the childs. And since its not born yet, i suggest you just let it be born. Humans don't have ...

It's not taking it lightly. You seriously think a child should be born into the world, even if it's going to have a miserable life? Plenty of people decide by ...

:smt042 I'm sorry...I actually laughed at loud. I'd like to meet this person that can raise the dead too. :wink: No one is suggesting science is infallible, but just because ...

Like the Jews???? :shock: :? Your logic scares me sometimes. What on earth are you on about? :? Does that mean you don't believe in contraception, since it kills sperm? ...

I'm afraid I skipped over most of what you'd written Commando. You're being rude and ignorant in ignoring every bit of information people give to you (and have taken time ...

That's not a new question. It's the same as the original one. You've just rephrased it, and again, practically every point has been covered. :wink:

I was thinking about the Robin Ince sketch when I was writing that... :D But I didn't want to offend anyone either. It is a very funny sketch though. :wink:

Ooh, and I've got information on how life begins. :D I knew I knew it, but my brain refused to spew out the information, so I had to refresh it ...

Hasn't this discussion gone round and round in circles several times over just with the same points being made? :? Isn't it about time someone closed it down??? :wink:

Well, I'm too lazy to read all of that (it looks very sciency, and sciene hurts my head. It's not sciency at all. It's some very shaky arguments in the ...

A catistocracy sounds perfect. :wink: Long naps sound lovely... :D

Huh. Yeah, I suppose that you guys are right. I'm going to take the symbolic side of things. Perhaps God's 'periods' were much longer than I thought. Maybe even millions ...

You're being ridiculous. It's impossible to explain evolution without random existence, but why random existence should be non-scientific makes no sense to me. Science is random. Or rather, there are ...

I wouldn't suggest there wasn't proof of how old layers in the earth are or how old fossils are or that 'scientists cant prove it' without going back in time. ...

When dealing with a scientific matter (eg. paleontology) it's best to leave the Bible - or any other religious book - out of it. Sticking with the facts and evidence ...