No matter how I tried to read this critically, it just wouldn't come.
I could only read it casually, taking it for what I see it as, rather than what it is intended to be. Perhaps they areone and the same. Perhaps not.
In any case, I enjoyed reading this--
You used much symbolism, which is always fun, especially when left vague and separated from the other syumbols in the poem, for it allows room for further interpretation, letting the reader make of it what they will.
The best thing I liked about this poem?
Emoceans.
That word is so cool. Nice work, Incandescence.
--Quiz
PS: the Oatmeal Man?
