a time to be so small

3 posts
User avatar
Gender Other
Points 32184
Reviews 153
I blame Kyllorac for this.

we were looking at the numbers, the dance of
ones and twos, threes and fours, and their escorts:
the s-p-d-f that made us turn our heads sideways
and squint at the pages, at the charts and tables
that sprawled above the walls of text we could
not bring ourselves to read, as above us the
teacher spoke on, words like probability and orbitals
or energy levels catching at our minds then slipping
away, carried by the hushed chatter that buzzed in
the spaces between us. 2-s rolled down the page,
both a sphere and a neat little box that could spin and
spin, up and away until it came down, and this we were
told was energy, held like a treasure or a toy in the
gray cloud of possibilities around the certainty of
a nucleus. 2-s rolled down the page and then it was
3-d, blooming starburst and skipping ahead in that
strange illogic of textbooks everywhere. we were told
this was how it worked, because numbers said so, and i did
not understand but did not care because it could be memorized,
which was easier than remembering how those other letters
worked, the ones that pranced l-m-n, more abstract and less
playful, though probably just as important.
i drew a graph and it waved at me, irregular and smooth
as it widened across the paper, and then i drew another,
a different one, that thought itself a disc but was not
sure, which i figured was fair because we didn’t know
either, and could just guess at it, like playing hide and
seek in the dark, except with tiny tiny things that spun
and whirled and gave each other room and roles to play,
and, i liked to think, shivered full of energy and
all the possibilities, all the spaces in the world.


Small edit to fix commas and add hyphens
Last edited by Jagged on Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lumi: they stand no chance against the JAG SAFETY BLANKET




User avatar
Gender None specified
Points 72525
Reviews 1220
Allow me to profess my undying love and devotion to you, my darling Jagged. I happily accept any and all blame related to this poem.

My only suggestion for this is to maybe write out "two s" or "2-s" rather than "2s" as those unfamiliar with orbitals and chemistry may read it as "twos".

Okay, I lied. I have a couple other issues.

2s rolled down the page and then it was

You already have "2s rolled down the page" verbatim earlier in the poem, and while I didn't notice it first read through, you might want to consider rewording.

playful, though, probably, just as important.

The commas around "probably" disrupt the flow and aren't necessary. I suggest removing them.

But yes. You wrote a poem about chemistry and it makes me happy. I'm not sure if anyone else will get it, but you can rest assured that at least I appreciate all your work and think this a pretty decent poem, to boot. :D

P.S. - Where is that villanelle on pants? I've been looking forward to it.
Secretly a Kyllorac, sometimes a Murtle.
There are no chickens in Hyrule.
Princessence: A LMS Project
WRFF | KotGR




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 62375
Reviews 315
I'm not sure if anyone else will get it,


*waves arms* I get it. And I LOVELOVELOVE it when people write poetry about science. It makes my day, seeing my two passions combined. It also gives me a very intimate feeling with the poem when I get something that not all other readers will. *snuggles into the poem to review*

(I'm uncharacteristically excited. Can you tell?)

Firstly, the structure. Why is it in one large lump? Not that that's bad...just thinking that you could be a lot more creative with the form than this. Okay, so why not use the content to determine the structure, to give it a more intellectual edge. Since there are four orbitals, s-p-d-f, why not break up the poem into four parts? Just an idea :D.

One recurrent thing about the way it written (and you know I enjoyed it - it's just the little things I'm commenting on here) was how you're describing actually learning about atomic structure in a classroom with a teacher. For me, this gives it far too much a formulaic feel, like you've just learnt it, like you feel like you have to confess everything about where this idea first came to you from. I'm not a big fan of doing that - giving away the source of the idea (which, I have to say, is pretty clear regardless of whether you explicitly state it or not). It'd be better if you just focussed on the orbitals etc themselves instead of wasting words going over yourself sitting in a classroom learning about it. That would show more a passion for the chemistry as opposed to a passion for...writing about chemistry.

we were looking at the numbers, the dance of


Opening lines are VERY important, so I'm not going to skim over them. I've already said the passive 'we were looking at the numbers' is too classroomy and not enough get-in-there-right-into-the-atomy. So, it's just the word 'dance' that annoys me. I see it used far too often to describe the wondrous movements of objects that people know no other way of describing. Be creative, dive into a thesauraus. Any word but that.

Reading on, I can see that the whole setting is a classroom setting - it's everywhere and I don't want to see it. Why the '2-s' on the PAGE? Why only existing in that flat, 2-dimensional world? Why not make it come to life, life beyond the exercise book, the textbook, the whiteboard? Why not revel in the true beauty of it, rather than the derived-from-the-curriculum beauty?

Parts I enjoyed: '3-d, blooming starburst' (fabulous), 'hushed chatter' (good personification), 'and their escorts' (haha, scandalous). The rest is more narrative, very verb-ish to convey the movement and life of the electrons, but I see few lines that will really stick in my mind in the future and make me want to come back and read the poem.

So...hope that helped, and good luck with revisions!



I'm a fledgling potato bird that lives in a nest in the rp forums
— Ley