Literature is a highly debated topic, and its worth is ultimately a matter of opinion - like fine art. What do you consider to be the qualifications for real literature, and what would an example be?
Well, I know that most "literature" is also categorized under the "literary fiction" genre. This has come to suggest a heavily character-driven work that often lacks your typical plot structure (i.e. not much "action" occurs) and tends to focus on heavier themes such as family, life, love, etc. There also tends to be a higher quality of writing in literary fiction, with heavy use of literary language techniques. In many circles, there is no place for "genre" work in literature.
Of course, this is what the academics want us to think. I personally would like to see more "literature" that is plot-driven as well as well written (there is actually loads of it already in existence - just look at H.G. Wells - but I think it's harder for genre writers to prove their work as literary because it often has an actual plot where things happen other than metaphysical reasonings).
Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte The War of the Worlds by HG Wells Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen The Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien 1984 by George Orwell Murder on the Orient Express by Agatha Christie
So I guess the common denominator here is quality of writing, originality and power of ideas, and their legacies.
