My Hardest Devil's Advocate: Should You Be A White Nationalist? (And More B.S.)

WARNING: This document contains a Devil's Advocate argument for White Nationalism, please DON'T READ IT IF YOU ARE EASILY TRIGGERED. Normally, I would leave people to figure it out for themselves, but I don't want to hurt anyone.

The Constitution Of The United States Is NOT Based On The Ten Commandments

The Constitution of the United States IS NOT based on the Bible - the word "God" is nowhere to be found in it, and there is no law anywhere in the United States against believing or not believing in any god. Only 3 of the 10 Commandments have any corresponding laws, and none of them are exclusive to Christianity. Let's go over them one by one:

Commandment #1. "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Not only is this commandment nowhere to be found in the Constitution, it totally violates the First Amendment, which states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." We're just getting started and we've utterly undermined the American concept of religious liberty!
Commandment #2. "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image..." Again this violates the First Amendment right to freedom of religion, and freedom of speech - not to mention the idiotic hypocrisy of Christians who insist on putting a graven image of a document that prohibits the making of graven images on public property like government buildings!
Commandment #3. "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain." Again, this completely contradicts the First Amendment right to freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Commandment
#4."Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy." This commandment may have influenced their society in days gone by, but working on weekends is hardly illegal, and nobody gives it a second thought anymore.
Commandment #5. "Honor thy father and thy mother." There is no law requiring children to honor their parents - in fact, the only laws in this regard are those that protect children from abusive parents who are not worthy of being honored.
Commandment #6. "Thou shall not kill." This commandment is certainly a good idea, but all civilized societies have had laws against murder since long before the Bible was written - the Code of Hammurabi for example. In other words, it's hardly an original law or unique to Christianity.
Commandment #7. "Thou shalt not commit adultery." While committing adultery is usually a bad idea, there are no laws in the United States against it. Otherwise 38 million Ashley Madison users would be in jail right now - right?
Commandment #8. "Thou shalt not steal." Like #6, this is also a good idea, but not indigenous or unique to Christianity.
Commandment #9. "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor." Also known as "perjury" when done in court, this commandment, like #6 and #8, is not unique to Christianity, and committing perjury while not under oath is not a crime. Advertisers and politicians do it all the time.
Commandment #10. "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's." Well, it's not only perfectly legal to covet your neighbor's possessions, their capitalistic economy would be in serious trouble if people didn't! And please note that your neighbor's wife is listed as simply part of his property, which does contradict their legal concept of gender equality.
Now tell me again - how is the Constitution or "American Law" based on the 10 Commandments? Oh, and one more pesky little detail - there is no archaeological evidence whatsoever that the so called "Exodus" of the Hebrew slaves out of Egypt ever took place. No artifacts have ever been excavated from the Sinai where 2 million people allegedly spent in excess of 350,000 hours, which is PREPOSTEROUS! Even the Jewish school of archaeology has concluded that the "Exodus" story was entirely made up! That means the main character "Moses" is made up, and the "parting of the Red Sea" and the "golden calf" AND the mighty 10 Commandments themselves! So even if the Constitution and laws were based on the 10 Commandments, they would still be based on 100% bullshit. Any questions?

Should You Be A White Nationalist?

Quick Answer: Hell No! But what is the distinction drawn between "White Nationalism" and racism in the mind of the race obsessed fools who often pose the question? None whatsoever. It is just another way to slur a man as a racist, and that simple fact needs stating at the outset to dispense with derpy and pointless mud slinging.

Fact: generally speaking, an honest person will observe that for some reason, "white" nations happen to be the greatest nations on planet earth. INDISPUTABLY. (Minus the odd exception, such as Japan or South Korea, and a few other, mostly Asian places that do pretty well for themselves.) Germany. Switzerland, the white parts of England... A two minute Google search could make this apparent to you.

Armed with this knowledge, what should my attitude be towards "White Nationalists?" What is my opinion SUPPOSED to be about the best nations on earth-which are white majority countries? It's not an accident or coincidence: these nations are the way they are based on the people who built and occupy these nations. Their exists no overlord A.I. demanding Germany be awesome, it is the German people who make it that way! (Sometimes. Sometimes they obey the commands of frothing madman and goose-step their entire nation into the oven to make the country into Corpse Cake for the Dear Leader to present to Satan, Socialist Supreme, directly before consummating their unholy Devils Duo by licking Lucifer's Cock. )

I like that heritage-white people have a different history, nationally, culturally, socially,-and these unique and different traditions known as "Western Civilizations" are sacred to me in direct proportion to their ranking of Objective Awesomeness.

None of this should suggest a love of the "White Race" or a distaste or hatred for other races among those capable of paying attention, but it is worth noting explicitly that I am simply laying out the facts of history, even as I point out that the best nations on earth are NOT mythical white ethno-states. Western traditions deserve respect.

Now! That is not to say fuck other traditions and attributes in a blanket manner! If I observe that a woman has fantastic breasts, does that mean the girl beside her is unattractive or flat chested as a boy? Well, she might be... but DAMN those small Asian woman sure are FUCKING nice, aren't they? Maybe you should give her a try, maybe do both at once? This is the American Way!

THEY will tell you everything I just said make me a bad person... They will proclaim with the proactive glee of a giant pea brained pet piss-ant, "You are a White Nationalist! RACIST!" as they spray their happy piss all over your living room carpet. But do not let the foul odor distract you! Love my family. Love ME. Love everyone who deserves love. But this is just a stupid game because they need a villain to kick the piss out of them. Fuck them. With love. Maybe.

You should love and respect everyone, but you should love and respect everyone CONDITIONALLY. I am against rape and murder, because yes, like you, I'M SO FUCKING BRAVE AND FULL OF VIRTUE! But more to some semblance of an actual fucking point, these crimes are objectively morally evil and terrible and inexcusable, and I am a man with some degree of moral principle, just like you. At no point will I think about the races involved in any rape and murder, because I do not care. However, my condemnation of rape and murder is unwavering, and my principles stand-there are no excuses to be made.

If I find out that Green Daddy smurfs (as opposed to the OBVIOUSLY superior Blue Daddy Smurfs Classic) are disproportionately stealing the aprons of underage pink smurfettes and putting their fingers in the poor girls' ears and running away, giggling, I am going to be disproportionately concerned with the apron stealing of wet fingered Green Daddy Smurf's, because this is appropriate given the statistics-smurf you if you disagree, and may Green Daddy smurf force his giant Green Dick up your ass!

...

Just kidding~

;3

Film Is Objective (In Principle)

A common claim on numerous film forums, podcasts, news comment-sections, and especially YouTube videos, is the assertion that evaluations of film quality are subjective, and that those of us who rightly point out that, for example, The Last Jedi is an objectively terrible film are wrong by default. I think this philosophy is bullshit. Advocating that art and art criticism are based purely on individual knee-jerk reactions of creativity and interpretations of such creativity, respectively, devalues the art and all who work to understand it. Claiming that film content and cinematic quality are subjective is the lamest, laziest, most cop-out answer one can make in film criticism. Similar to how people of faith propose to explain away the existence of a higher power by saying, "God works in mysterious ways," allegations of film's subjectivity are worse than a bad or nonsensical argument against or for a particular film. It is not even an argument. It is a non-answer, a half-hearted, throw-your-hands-up-in-the-air straw-man defense for people too lazy or ignorant to defend their position.
While no filmmaker or film academic is entirely free from biased perception of the world around them, some are clearly "more free" than others and are better able to dissociate their personal views and experiences from limiting their understanding of other people and their artistic expression. For that is what a true review is: An assessment of a film that is as free as possible from personal biases, which is backed by rational arguments, concrete examples (i.e. evidence of quality), and detailed explanation. A good reviewer does not only tell you whether a movie sucks or not, they explain why, and in detail.
There are oceans of difference in splitting hairs and disparate quality. It may be futile to determine whether a cinematic landmark like Citizen Kane is really "better" or "worse" than an American classic like The Godfather, but much, much larger contrasts in cinematic craft exist in excess and speak to the very real nature of objective cinematic quality. For instance, compare either of the former to anything Adam Sandler has ever done, or any blockbuster from Transformers: Age of Extinction My assertion that Fight Club is a better piece of cinematic art than Transformers isn't my opinion, it's a fucking fact.
In other words, while it may be impossible to prove with 100% certainty the precise cinematic quality of all films relative to each another, that doesn't mean cinematic quality doesn't exist, or that isn't objectively measurable in some way based on the craftsmanship in the art of film-making, independent of our own personal positive or negative evaluations of a film like, "I liked it," or, "I hated it." Alleging that cinematic quality and craftsmanship are subjective is akin to giving everyone gold stars for trying in little league soccer or an A for effort in academia. This bullshit philosophy only devalues the entire craft of not only film itself but film criticism as well, because it argues that there is actually no craft in either of them!