Hi Lim! I'm working through the checklist, and I remembered you like structured poems, so I wanted to drop a review for you
I really liked this piece! Since the structure of the poem is limited to only five lines, you don't have a lot of space to expand on big, flowery imagery. That said, the piece still has strong imagery that draws the reader in to its story, the back and forth between two lovers. You have a really great flow, especially in the first stanza, that makes it easy to follow. The second stanza tripped me up some on the third line, though, which made me have to reread the first few lines of that stanza.
Within your first stanza, you build up the conflict of this piece. The scene is set in winter, which is typically thought of as cold and harsh, which matches the later description of the second lover being distant and perhaps emotionally cold. This speaker is trying to move southbound, which I read as trying to find warmer climates, like how birds migrate south in the winter (if they're in the northern hemisphere), and warm up their partner and restore their relationship in some way. I really like the imagery of trying to "find" your lover, even when they stand beside you, since it really solidifies the problems they are having with one another. It also sets up the issue as something deeper, perhaps more long lasting, like an entire season, rather than a flippant issue.
The second stanza is clearly the response, from the one who is distant. They have a more bleak outlook on this relationship, inquiring why moving south would help anything with the line "why would snowflakes / melt under a southern sun?" I really like this idea, since it challenges the assumption that things could be better for them, or maybe it's just cold and harsh everywhere.
However, it was the next lines that confused me a bit. I think the third and fourth lines are saying "you should forget of clear blue skies", but you've flipped them to fit the structure of a somonka, but that wasn't initially obvious to me, and it pulled me out of the flow for a moment. Is the second lover suggesting that they must forget of the possibility of something between them? Or are they suggesting that this is something they must weather out. Also, I did appreciate the parallel between the torchlight and the wildfire, but I didn't quite see how the wildfire connected to the blue skies. The use of "though" implies some kind of rebuttal, but the images don't feel connected to me, at least not in a contradiction sense. The forget line feels like it's saying this won't get better, and the wildfire is a warning of destruction that could come, which is an optimistic line.
Is there meant to be a sense of resolution at the end or end at uneasiness for these two lovers? As it stands now, it leans towards the second, since the response is much less optimistic and hints at demise instead of the restitution the first speaker seeks. I think either are fine, just wanted to give you the impression I felt of the piece
Overall nice job! Hopefully some of my thoughts helped, haha. Happy writing ^^
~ Wolfe
Points: 26330
Reviews: 767
Donate