Alright, let's get this piece out of the Green Room, shall we?
There’s no going back from where I am now.
Nice opening line. It's not a strong hook, but it's a hook nonetheless, and I like the the simplicity of it.
I’m not listening to anything he says, and all I say is, “Yes.” and the only gesture that comes to me is nodding my head up and down.
Right, so there's a couple of issues here that I found. First, I don't think 'I say is' quite fits here. I think here's not really about telling us what he's doing, it's more to what he's done in regards of not listening to the other person. 'I've said' is more fitting, and there should be a comma instead of a period after 'Yes'.
“Where I am. This is where I want to be.” I say to the man.
I think the first sentence can be cut. The second one isn't much different than the first, it's just a more elaborate version of the first. Also, dialogue issue: a comma after 'be', instead of a period.
But I don’t know if I want to be anywhere.
It's more complete to have an 'else' after 'anywhere'.
I see them, they're unconscious.
Right, I'm not following up the plot here. Who're 'they'? The only person you've introduced to us is the doctor, and that's only one. I think you need to explain who're they first before making the narrator observes them. After that, you said 'they had to leave me'. Again, who're they? Are they the same people the narrator's observing, or different entirely? I think this piece needs more clarity that it's given right now.
Alright, now the story. Like I said, there should be more clarity to this piece. My first mistake is to assume the narrator is a police of some sort when s/he's given the badge, which for me, is more associated to polices rather than doctors, so it's a slight surprise to find out s/he's a doctor, after all.
It's pretty interesting too about the part where second person pronoun is used here; it makes me thinking of who's 'you', and what does that person meant to the narrator. From the context given, it seems to me like that person is a soldier of some sort because you mention about being in the battlefield and the narrator having to carry out that person's body out of it.
Anyway, if there's more clarity to this piece, the message would be stronger. As it is, this piece leaves much to be desired. I think a bit more elaboration here and there would make it more complete, and I think some backstory or even a brief flashback can really get us understand what's going on here. The ending seems out of the blue to me, so maybe you can fix that too.
And that is all. Keep up the good job!
Points: 25
Reviews: 472
Donate