Young Writers Society

Home » Forums » Resources » Writing Tips

Series and Book Titles Discussion

User avatar
413 Reviews

Gender: Other
Points: 11559
Reviews: 413
Sun Jun 10, 2018 11:59 pm
View Likes
Vervain says...

What's your process for naming books? Naming a series?

Which is more important to you?

Will a bad series title break a good book? Will it outweigh a good book title?

Will a bad book title outweigh an interesting series title?

What are your favorite book and series titles?
stay off the faerie paths

formerly Lareine

User avatar
442 Reviews

Gender: Female
Points: 40793
Reviews: 442
Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:06 pm
DarkPandemonium says...

For me, naming books is a BIG part of my process. I feel physically incapable of writing novel unless I have a fitting name for it, though I couldn't tell you why. I know titles are one of those things that change throughout draft stages, but it doesn't stop me needing one.

I usually just flounder about until a name comes to me, so I don't really have a system. I do believe names are important, though. It's effectively your opening line, the first thing the reader sees of your story. It doesn't outweigh the content of the book, but it can still mean the difference between drawing the reader in and letting their eyes sweep on past.

I'm not really sure what you mean about a bad book title outweighing an interesting series title, but in regards to my favourite titles, I have to mention my lifelong love His Dark Materials. I love it as a trilogy title because it just stands out as so unusual, not like any other series names I've come across - and I like that it derives from Paradise Lost, as well, referencing the materials from which God shaped the universe. The books themselves have fairly standard names, though.

As far as standalone books go, more of my favourite titles include A Thousand Splendid Suns, Fahrenheit 451 (though I don't think much of the book itself), The Bone Clocks, Cloud Atlas, Not the Only Sky and The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time. I suppose the fact that I (mostly) enjoyed all of these books might have biased me towards the titles, but perhaps that just means that names aren't quite as important as we think. It doesn't hurt to have a good one, though.
We have to build the Republic of Heaven where we are, because for us, there is no elsewhere.

The Amber Spyglass

User avatar
491 Reviews

Gender: None specified
Points: 23533
Reviews: 491
Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:39 pm
Tenyo says...

Series titles, I tend to go for something simple and generic, so long as it sounds cool. For the individual books, the longer the title, the better =D Usually a minature summary of the plot, setting or main character.

I don't think a bad series title would break a good book, but I think it makes it harder to persuade others to read it, and one of the best things about a good book is being able to share it. Recommending 'A Song of Ice and Fire' sounds like I'm trying to get a fantasy reader into some poetic fairytale. Recommending 'Game of Thrones' much better suits the theme, so the title does the work for me.

In terms of titles, my standout favourite is still 'Across the Nightingale Floor.' The rest of the series fell flat, but one of the most iconic moments of that book is when the sum of Takeo's life and efforts finally come down to that simple act of crossing a room, and suddenly all the pieces point to the title and the words kind of explode.

'The Painted Veil' is also one of my favourites, for a similar reason. The title always seems to indicate something quite superficial, until the moment its significance is revealed and it becomes a thing that kind of envelopes the fragility of the story and its characters.
We were born to be amazing.

User avatar
1108 Reviews


Gender: Female
Points: 52105
Reviews: 1108
Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:53 am
StellaThomas says...

I've never written a series, and even though I have thoughts on a companion novel for Silk (called Linen), I wouldn't go about naming them anything until they both existed. To me, there's nothing more discouraging than a presumptuous series title on the cover of a debut novel. Especially when it has a word like "chronicles" or "saga" in it. Creative names for trilogies - like 'His Dark Materials' - work to an extent, but the majority of people still refer to it as "Northern Lights" around here. And the Harry Potter series never had a series name other than "the Harry Potter series) - obvious, non-pretentious, straightforward. But when you name your first book, for instance- "Fever - book one of the Chemical Garden trilogy" - it's cumbersome. It feels like you can't let your book stand by itself. And books should stand by themselves, even if they don't necessarily have to.

I'm terrible at naming things, to me a title is transient until I see the shape of the story and the title that fits it. 'Unruly' had several different titles and often no title at all until I fixed on this one, and it works and I'm happy.

Simple titles make me happy. Although I really love the long titles too - "The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society", " The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry" - they so well encapsulate the tone of the book within.
"Stella. You were in my dream the other night. And everyone called you Princess." -Lauren2010

"For a short space of time I remained at the window watching the pallid lightnings that played above Mont Blanc and listening to the rushing of the Arve, which pursued its noise way beneath. The same lulling sounds acted as a lullaby to my too keen sensations; when I placed my head upon my pillow, sleep crept over me; I felt it as it came and blessed the giver of oblivion."
— Mary Shelley, Frankenstein