I recently read 'The Mist', which is a novella by Stephen King (but I am unsure of the title of the anthology it derives from).
I believe Stephen King is a fascinating writer, and his description of setting, character, and theme allows me to delve into his books with a more 'greater' perspective of where he acquires his ideas and how he displaces them.
However, with it being a novella at around 200 or so pages, 'The Mist' did not succeed with fully grasping me. I believe it may have been because King (in a way) dragged out a story that could have been told in a shorter manner, but used intense descriptions and prolonged speech to diminish a setting to its core.
I rate this book (even though IT IS a novella) a 7.5 / 10 - YOUR AVERAGE NOVEL. It has a good storyline, excellent character development, and even [spoiler]unique descriptions of the other worldly beings that become part of the supermarket-evil mist fiasco.[/spoiler] However, the overall book did not see to become what a superior novel represents (I do give it some "slack" for being a novella from an anthology, though).
SIDE NOTE: I saw 'The Mist' movie after reading the book, and I must say, I REALLY enjoyed the movie. There were several differences and comparisons, but I seemed to feel more connected to the film, with the visual display of [spoiler]character's personalities, exotic creatures, and thematic elements detailing catastrophe between the protagonists themselves, and religious counterparts.[/spoiler] Oh, and also because I LOOOOOOVE movies and everything about them, even better than any book, any day!
This is my first review.
Sorry if it is...HORRID!
Gender:
Points: 890
Reviews: 1