z

Young Writers Society


Question about economics.



User avatar



Gender: Male
Points: 890
Reviews: 1
Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:34 am
Enigmatic_Penguin says...



In my story, I will have a village in the north.

It is next to taiga full with great timber and a fishful sea, yet I would like to keep it a medium sized village.

Would saying that those two markets are the only real markets of economic opportunity and that there was already enough competition give reason for it not expanding into a trade center?
  





User avatar
425 Reviews



Gender: Male
Points: 11417
Reviews: 425
Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:34 am
Nate says...



Interesting question. But a few things... is Taiga the name of the second village or do you mean something else? And what do you mean by trade center?
  





User avatar



Gender: Male
Points: 890
Reviews: 1
Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:06 am
Enigmatic_Penguin says...



Nate wrote:Interesting question. But a few things... is Taiga the name of the second village or do you mean something else? And what do you mean by trade center?


Oh, sorry; Taiga is a Russian word for forest. It is basically a northern forest with lots of pines and other evergreen trees.

By trade center I mean like a huge town. I mean, if the trees are so great and the fish so fruitful, I'd need a reason for the town to remain a village size.
  





User avatar
425 Reviews



Gender: Male
Points: 11417
Reviews: 425
Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:48 am
Nate says...



Whether a large city or not develops really depends on a number of factors, and for the sake of simplicity, I'd suggest not coming up with an economics factor.

If you look at states like Montana or Maine, they have plenty of fish and forest, but very few people. The same goes with places like the Amazon. In most cases, people hardly even wonder why a small town is just a small town despite being located in a great area, so you probably don't even need an excuse.

However, if you want to go with the economics factor, just don't have the village located near an ocean or in a river delta. A lot of large cities developed because they are in a natural harbor along the ocean (New York City, San Francisco, Alexandria) or lie at the confluence of rivers (Chicago). Also make sure the river is too shallow for ocean-going ships.
  





User avatar
3821 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 3891
Reviews: 3821
Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:56 am
Snoink says...



Or you can look at Alaska. Lots of pine and game and fish there... not many people. It's too cold. :P

A question! Do your people wear clothes? What doesn't make sense to me is how they can be all fish and timber, yet not have ready materials for clothes. So yeah.
Ubi caritas est vera, Deus ibi est.

"The mark of your ignorance is the depth of your belief in injustice and tragedy. What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, the Master calls the butterfly." ~ Richard Bach

Moth and Myth <- My comic! :D
  





User avatar



Gender: Male
Points: 890
Reviews: 1
Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:50 pm
Enigmatic_Penguin says...



Snoink wrote:Or you can look at Alaska. Lots of pine and game and fish there... not many people. It's too cold. :P

A question! Do your people wear clothes? What doesn't make sense to me is how they can be all fish and timber, yet not have ready materials for clothes. So yeah.


That is the problem; they trade a lot with Merchants and the Dwarves in the mountains to the north.

I think I'll just go with Nate's plan.
  








i, too, use desk chairs for harm and harm alone
— Omni