z

Young Writers Society


Review Battle [Game Thread]



User avatar



Gender: Other
Points: 600
Reviews: 0
Mon Aug 15, 2016 3:48 pm
View Likes
ReviewWarrior says...



In order to encourage YWS members to read and review (and we are talking about quality reviews), ReviewWarrior is here to hold a competition called Review Battle. The way of it is simple:

1. Two reviewers agree to battle each other.
2. They propose a number of reviews they have to achieve, and donate an agreed number of equal points to ReviewWarrior.
3. The first reviewer who achieves the number of reviews wins. It also means there is no deadline.
4. The accumulated points donated to ReviewWarrior early will be rewarded to the victor.

Now, as you have heard, there are two kinds of reviews; quality review and quantity review. The review counted here is quality review. The requirements for said review are as below:

1. Include one way for the author to improve the work as a whole.
2. Include three smaller things that can be improved.
3. Explain why these things need to be improved.

Additional requirements are as below:

1. Review Green Room pieces only.
2. Poems cannot be reviewed (this is to ensure the reviewers to review works from the same type).

And that is all! Please do not post in this topic as it will only be used by ReviewWarrior and @ReviewBuddy who will participate as a co-host for this battle. Any questions or discussions can be posted in Discussion Thread.
Last edited by ReviewWarrior on Mon Aug 15, 2016 3:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
  





User avatar



Gender: Other
Points: 600
Reviews: 0
Mon Aug 15, 2016 3:52 pm
View Likes
ReviewWarrior says...



1st Battle: @Holysocks vs @Lightsong
Number of Reviews: 15
Number of Points Donated: 200
Number of Points Awarded: 400
  








I was flummoxed by fractious Franny's decision to abrogate analgesics for the moribund victims of the recent conflagration. Of course, to display histrionics was discretionary, but I did so anyways, implicating a friend in my drama to make the effect cumulative. I think a misanthrope would have a prosaic appellation, perhaps one related to autonomy and the rejection of anthropocentrism. I think they wouldn't think much of the prominence of watching the coagulation of tea to prognosticate future malevolent events, not even if those events were related to jurisprudence.
— Spearmint