Young Writers Society

All you saying that men in nothing look better than men in suits have clearly never seen a man in nothing.

Seriously, we look stupid.

Speak for yourself, mate [/Adonis]

The internet agrees:



ref: http://iwastesomuchtime.com/on/?i=25299

Q.E.D.

Then where do uniforms fit into the equation?

Men in suits > Men in nothing.
For one, suits are really classy and scream "I am a gentleman", and two, suits hide the nasty stuff that [straight] women don't like to see (case dependant).

noninjaspresent wrote:Men in suits > Men in nothing.
For one, suits are really classy and scream "I am a gentleman", and two, suits hide the nasty stuff that [straight] women don't like to see (case dependant).

Although I wanted to not get involved with this post, I would have to say I agree. Also, men in stripes and jeans > men in suits. Just saying.

And I would have to agree with Nate. What's with this topic? I'm a bit concerned...

And I would have to agree with Nate. What's with this topic? I'm a bit concerned...

Alright, I'll give y'all the lowdown. Pigeon and Kit reckon the only way for a topic to be popular in SDaD is to have sex and/or death in the title. Aaaaaand... point proven I think. But still, men in nothing > men in suits (those who disagree clearly don't see the right men in nothing).

I disagree always and forever.

men in anything > men in nothing


...unless John Barrowman is involved.
John Barrowman can wear as little as he likes.