Young Writers Society

Now that I have your attention, I have a thesis you should consider and discuss in an intelligent fashion.

"Men in suits are to (straight) women what women in lingerie are to (straight) men."

Also consider the following:

Men in suits > men not in suits.

Women in lingerie > women not in lingerie.

But keep in mind:

Men in nothing > men in suits.

Women in nothing > women in lingerie.

Discuss.

By this logic, I can assert the following:

1. (Straight) Women are (sexually) attracted to men in suits.
2. (Non-Cremated) Men wear suits when displayed in a casket after death.

∴ (Straight) Women are (sexually) attracted to dead men, making (straight) women (straight) necrophiliacs.

^ALL THE AWARDS

So should dead women be buried in lingerie?

Karzkin wrote:So should dead women be buried in lingerie?

My sources say yes.

Men in Grime > Men in Suits

See: Aragorn, Cowboys, Lumberjacks

Women in Skimpy Armor > Women in Lingere

See: SlaveGirl!Leia, practically every MMORPG in existence

Naked > However Clothed

only if

Body = Sexy

And so, if we want to put an end to unintentional necrophilia at wakes, we must make all dead bodies as completely unsexy as possible. Nudity + Careful Dismemberment = A Job Well Done.

Men in nothing > men in suits.

Women in nothing > women in lingerie.

Makes sense.

Now let's run around downtown with no clothes on

Ah, but I beg to differ.

Men in nothing < Men in suits

And if we follow this logic;

1. (straight) Women are (sexually) attracted to men in suits.

2. (straight) Men are (sexually) attracted to women in nothing.

But here's were things get funny.

1. (lesbian) Women are (sexually) attracted to women in nothing.

Therefore men should all be dead and women should always be naked.

Men in nothing < Men in suits

What? How exactly do you figure that?

(straight) Women are (sexually) attracted to men in suits.

Ok, yes, but I would postulate that (straight) women are more (sexually) attracted to men in nothing than they are to men in suits.

Basically, women in nothing > men in nothing, right?

Men in nothing < Men in suits

Sooooo true. :3

Suit-less Men < Suited Men < Bare Men = Suit-less Men

I spy an inconsistency!

Whhhhhyyy is this in Serious Discussion and Debate?
But I digress.

Oh this is a very serious discussion lightning. I await the outcome with baited breath.

All you saying that men in nothing look better than men in suits have clearly never seen a man in nothing.

Seriously, we look stupid.

What the...