Young Writers Society

[deleted]

I liked Brave and the concept, but it is very forgetable. I thought I would like tit more than I did, being historical and all, but it was just meh

I didn't like Cinderella. She was so passive.

Okay, Anna and Elsa was a tie but i voted for Anna cause im a younger sis and ive been shhut out before SO ha. Also

Her voice is annoying and she's just not that relatable or interesting.

OMG you sound just like my middle sis, she HATES and i repeat HATES snow white FOR THAT EXACT REASON! Now, personally idk I have three. Ariel IDIOT! Cinderella POSS MUCH? and most of all Aurora! UGH LITTLE MISS 'I WAS CURSED HAVE PITTY ON ME' AS IF! ANYWAYS the point is they SUCK. Also, Fave princesses of all time:
1) Pochohontas
2) Anastasia
3) Anna
4) Belle
4) Jasmine
Jasmine and Belle got the same number cause i like them equal. If you didnt happen to notice cinderella ariel and aroura WERE NOT on here and they're off there for a PERFECTLY GOOD REASON and each of theirs is completely personal to them SPECIFICALLY! none of them are on there for the same reason. Thanks,

I don't see how Pocohantas is that hot, honestly. It was a decent movie, but Disney should not dabble in real history. Hunchy was based off of a book and they were able to pull the adaptation off just fine. Same with Hercules, since you can always use Greek mythology as a playground, but there is just something about Pocahantas that bothered me, for instance Ratcliffe's (the first governor of Virginia) being a bad guy, John Smith being a dashing princy dude (he was an almost forty year old alcoholic with a huge beard), as well as the incorporation of the weeping willow tree, which isn't indigenous to Virginia at all, not introduced to it until about 1715 during Gov. Alexander Spotswood's (an ancestor of mine) time as governor. Not to mention the fact that the landscape of Virginia was too magical and cliffy and even somewhat tropical & foreign. Jamestown is located on a freaking swamp with a whole bunch of mosquitos, not some magical pseudo-rainforest. I know that because my vacation house is in Williamsburg, fifteen minutes away.

I feel that it was a decent way to introduce children to Early US history, but it should be explained to them that 90% of the film is completely and utterly historically inaccurate.

That doesn't change the fact though that it is a charming, but extremely flawed, Disney musical.

There was one historical inaccuracy that really glared. Pocahontas saved John Smith, but he and Pocahontas never fell in love. John Rolfe and Pocahontas fell in love, and Pocahontas died of small pox on a trip to see Rolfe's homeland.

I didn't particularly care for the movie. Sure, Pocahontas was attractive and she had a strong personality, but the songs--eurgh. The only decent one was "Colors of the Wind." I also couldn't overlook the historical inaccuracies.

I chose Elsa because she's deep in a way most other giggly princesses aren't. She's independent and can fend for herself, and unlike Anna, she doesn't need a man. Anna was quite annoying, in the respect that Disney portrayed her as someone who couldn't be anyone without one.

@GoldFlame

Pocahontas had a raccon in it.

Those are cute!

GoldFlame wrote:There was one historical inaccuracy that really glared. Pocahontas saved John Smith, but he and Pocahontas never fell in love. John Rolfe and Pocahontas fell in love. Get your facts right, Disney. And Pocahontas died of small pox on a trip to see Rolfe's homeland.

I didn't particularly care for the movie. Sure, Pocahontas was attractive and she had a strong personality, but the songs--eurgh. The only decent one was "Colors of the Wind." I also couldn't overlook the historical inaccuracies.

I chose Elsa because she's deep in a way most other giggly princesses aren't. She's independent and can fend for herself, and unlike Anna, she doesn't need a man. Anna was quite annoying, in the respect that Disney portrayed her as someone who couldn't be anyone without one.

In Pocahontas 2, she goes home with John Smith, leaves him for John Rolfe, and dies of small pox. (I've never seen it, but from what I've heard..)

Hadj is right

In Pocahontas 2, she goes with John Rolfe to England, where John Smith and John Rolfe somewhat fight each other for her affection. It never shows she dies.

If you think that is bad, I know Hunchback of Notre Dame is definitely wrong. Frollo isn't all that bad. Plus, he didn't kill Quazi' s mom, Quazi didn't talk to gnomes, Phoebus was not consistent, and Esmeralda has a husband

It's a toss up between Snow White and Aurora. Awakened by love's true kiss and falling in immediate love? Pffft.

Hadj wrote:In Pocahontas 2, she goes home with John Smith, leaves him for John Rolfe, and dies of small pox. (I've never seen it, but from what I've heard..)

Wait, there's a Pocahontas 2? What?

GoldFlame wrote:
Wait, there's a Pocahontas 2? What?

Believe it or not, this straight to DVD excuse for a film was actually more historically accurate.

Pocahantas 1 is like the Eregon movie. Number two was the Percy Jackson movie. The latter was extremely untrue to the book, but it was much truer to the book as opposed to Eregon.

lostthought wrote:I know Hunchback of Notre Dame is definitely wrong. Frollo isn't all that bad. Plus, he didn't kill Quazi' s mom, Quazi didn't talk to gnomes, Phoebus was not consistent, and Esmeralda has a husband

STAHP! IT'S PERFECT THE WAY IT IS.

QUAZI WAS DEAF AS WELL! AND PHOEBUS IS ACTUALLY CHEATING ON HIS BRIDE-TO-BE WITH ESMERALDA. @Cole

I rest my case. Also, Phoebus is a lying cheat.