Stop The Scrolling Header | Enable the Scrolling Header

Firefox 3

News:  

Get A Free YWS Sticker!

Writing Olympics Event #7 Results!
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    
Saying Goodbye
Saying Goodbye

by GAM in Lyric Poetry
Young Writers Society Forum Index » Non-Fiction

This thread was created on April 3, 2006
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Digg It Del.icio.us


Affirmative action essay
Topic ID: 8265
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
marching_gurl89   View This User's Portfolio
your unoffical liberal talking history book
Master of the Forum

38
Gender: Gender:Female
Age: 18
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 1067
Reviews: 38
Country: i think i'm supposed to be somewhere.well if i cant remember it can't be that important
300 Points

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:51 pm    Post subject: Affirmative action essay Reply with quote

We had to write an essay for close up stating our position on affirmative action. It has not been graded yet

Do you know what affirmative action is? Well affirmative action is when an employer or college has to give extra consideration to minorities or women. Like for example some colleges or employers have a certain number of spaces that have to be minorities or women. I think that congress should not pass a law requiring affirmative action.

Affirmative action was created to right the wrongs of past discrimination, and to also help make workplaces and college campuses a more diverse place. I feel that affirmative action is reverse discrimination, meaning it discriminates against the majority group and does not give them equal opportunities. By using affirmative action and quotas for admissions and hiring it takes only race and sex into account and ignores the qualifications of the minority. What if a minority gets a job or into a college because of affirmative action and quotas? Had there not been affirmative action and quotas they would have not gotten it because they were not as qualified as everyone else was. An example of this happening is in the Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. What happened is the Alan Bakke has applied to enter the University of California medical school twice. The medical school has one hundred spots where sixteen are set aside for minorities. Well Mr. Bakke had been rejected both times even though Mr. Bakke’s qualifications, meaning his test scores and GPA, exceeded the minorities’ qualifications that had been accepted into the medical school. The Supreme Court ruled that the use of racial quotas that were to be used in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment, but they could use race as one of many factors in admissions. Now how is affirmative action fair? Doesn’t our society say that we are supposed to reward the hardest workers and the people with the best qualifications? Instead of rewarding the people with the best qualifications, it rewards people based on race and sex, something people cannot control.

America was founded on the belief of equality, meaning that everyone should be treated and have equal opportunities regardless of social status, economic status, race, sex, or religion. By using affirmative action, we are not enforcing this basic policy that America was founded on. Justice John Harlan in the dissenting opinion in Plessy v Ferguson stated “But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.” (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0163_0537_ZD.html) This means that the Constitution made it so everyone is equal regardless of race and that no one class of citizens she have more power over the other. What Justice John Harlan means when he said that our constitution is colorblind is that it gives that everyone is given the same rights regardless of the color of their skin. By using affirmative action in admissions to college and in hiring practices, you are giving people special rights and opportunities because of the color of their skin, not because of their qualifications. Instead of using affirmative action, you should look at the people’s qualifications, because everything like the constitution should be colorblind and give everyone equal opportunities. When you apply for college, I feel that they should not take your name and race down. They should instead give you a number and just use the number when looking at your qualifications. That way the board will be color blind when considering whether they want to let you into their college.

The other side says we need affirmative action to encourage diversity of opinions in workplaces and college campuses. However, by using affirmative action we are not encouraging diversity of opinions. We are just encouraging the diversity of way people looks. Who benefits from affirmative action is the minorities that are living in suburban America, because many of the minorities that live in the innercity or on reservations tend to fall through the cracks in the American education system. They tend to fall through the cracks of the American Educational system, because they tend to receive a lower level of education. So therefore, the colleges do not want to accept the courses that they took while in high school because they are a lower level. For example, a math class taken by someone in the tenth grade might be the level of an eighth grade class out in suburbia. Instead of using affirmative action in hiring and admissions to get more diversity we need to improve the education system so that someone that goes to school on a reservation or the innercity will get the same education as someone from the suburbs. So therefore, they will have the same qualifications as someone from suburbia will.

America is a rainbow of races, classes, and opinions but some workplaces and college campuses are not representive of America’s rainbow. Some people want to use affirmative action to make the workplaces more diverse and representive of that rainbow. I feel affirmative action is reverse discrimination, because it does not guarantee the same opportunities and rights to everyone. Affirmative action also completely disregards a person’s qualifications that they have worked very hard to receive. Affirmative action rewards the minority for being a minority not for being the best-qualified person.


_________________
~*~Peace, Love, and Protesters~*~
I'm not off beat!I'm marching to the beat of my own drum
I rock my socks
Hippielicious the bold new flavor from caroline
JFK BLOWN AWAY WHAT ELSE DO I HAVE TO SAY!!!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
LamaLama   View This User's Portfolio
Emperor of the Almost Infinite Empire- Formerly Qi
Speaker of the Forum

52
Gender: Gender:Male
Age: 23
Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 830
Reviews: 52

300 Points

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Affirmative action has already been passed, it was a part of the civil rights movement years and years ago. Now theres a bit of hubub about getting it removed.

_________________
Beware of the scary banana fingers! For they are mushy, and yellow.

I will change my sig whenever another member asks me too. (please request publicly) Last change: Nov. 12 by: Griffinkeeper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
marching_gurl89   View This User's Portfolio
your unoffical liberal talking history book
Master of the Forum

38
Gender: Gender:Female
Age: 18
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 1067
Reviews: 38
Country: i think i'm supposed to be somewhere.well if i cant remember it can't be that important
300 Points

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well for the assingment it was supposed to be like we are writing a letter to a senator and they are thinking about passing a law requiring affirmative action

_________________
~*~Peace, Love, and Protesters~*~
I'm not off beat!I'm marching to the beat of my own drum
I rock my socks
Hippielicious the bold new flavor from caroline
JFK BLOWN AWAY WHAT ELSE DO I HAVE TO SAY!!!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
niteowl   View This User's Portfolio
I'm an ol' king bee, honey,
Epic Novelist

363
Gender: Gender:Female
Age: 18
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 3896
Reviews: 363
Country: somewhere in America
391 Points

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First off, you should break it up into paragraphs. I saw the original so I know it's supposed to be, but Word formatting doesn't transfer.

Quote:
What Justice John Harlan means when he said that our constitution is colorblind is that it gives that everyone is given the same rights regardless of the color of their skin.


Okay, you lost me there. I think this would sound better as "Justice John Harlan meant that the Constitution is colorblind in the sense that it gives everyone the same rights regardless of skin color."

Quote:
Do you know what affirmative action is? Well affirmative action is when an employer or college has to give extra consideration to minorities or women. Like for example some colleges or employers have a certain number of spaces that have to be minorities or women. I think that congress should not pass a law requiring affirmative action.


If I were grading this, I would give the whole paper a B just for that horrendous introduction, but I'm probably tougher than your teacher, especially since this isn't for English. "Well" and "Like" have no place in an expository essay (aka formal writing). I know you're trying to use a question as an opener, but in this case it sounds awkward. A statement about affirmative action would fit better. Maybe "Affirmative action, a policy in some universities and companies, has been battled in court for years. This policy requires admissions officers and employers to give extra consideration to women or minorities. For example, some might have a quota, or a mininum number of slots that must be filled by minorites. Congress should not pass a law requiring affirmative action."

I've already gone over the rest of the paper on MSN, and besides some awkward sentences, it just needs a proofreading, BAD. Constitution and Supreme Court are always capitalized, and "I think" and "I believe" should be taken out, as they weaken your writing. But those points are fairly small. Keep writing! :thumb:

_________________
"You do ill if you praise, but worse if you censure, what you do not understand." Leonardo Da Vinci

Got YWS?

"Whoever said senior year was easier than junior year lied through their teeth" A friend of mine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
This thread was created on April 3, 2006
Post new topic   Reply to topic
   Young Writers Society Forum Index » Non-Fiction All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
This thread was created on April 3, 2006

Graphics By Bobo | YWS Sword & Shield Logo by Bobo
Bartemius says, Greetings, friend. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it. And send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay! Eternal happiness is just a dollar away. - Homer Simpson
Contact | Memberlist | Copyright Policy | YWS Store | Site Map
Facebook |  Goodreads |  Live Journal |  MySpace |  Wikipedia

© 2004 - 2008 The Young Writers Society